Ambedkar’s Perspective On Buddhism And Other Religions

Ambedkar’s Perspective on Buddhiam and Other Religions is a research work on Buddhist Developments in East and West since 1950-An Outline of World Buddhism and Ambedkarism today in nutshell and Inequality of Religions and Need for Conversion with special reference to Buddhism and Dr. Ambedkar of M.Phil. and Ph.D. Degrees awarded to the author by Nagpur University in 1990 and 1993 respectively Buddhist developments in East and West since 1950 are numerous, unprecedented and effective. 
The second part of brochure rests on Inequality of Religions and Need of Conversion with special reference to Buddhism and Dr. Ambedkar. From reading the book one may get an idea of number and extent of Spokesmen of Ambedkarism in Foreign Countries. As Ambedkarism has made its dent on the consciousness of foreign countries there arose multitude of representatives of Ambedkarism in those countries. The book also dwells on Impact of Dr. Ambedkar on Western Thinkers.
Dr. C. D. Naik is an eminent social scientist. After extensive travels and teaching in various schools, colleges and universities in India and Abroad Dr. C.D. Naik was appointed as Professor in the Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar National Institute of Social Sciences, Ambedkar Nagar (Mhow, M.P), where he has been serving as the Head of Dr. Ambedkar Thought and Philosophy Division since 1996. His Hindi translation, “Bouddha Dharma Hi Kyon” was published by Bhadant Anand Kausalyayan in Nagpur in 1975 and English translation, “Dr. Ambedkar: The Liberator” was published by Suk Sit Siam Publisher, INEB in Bangkok in 1991. Thoughts and Philosophy of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar is his latest published work.
DEDICATION of
Researcher’s First Literary Flower to
his Acharya Bhadant Dr. Anand Kausalyayan
on the eve of his first birth centenary

Contents

Preface
Introduction
 1. Limitation of the Topic and Definite Meaning of the Title
Phases of Buddhism, Buddhist Population; Buddhist Centres among Non-Buddhist Countries.
2. Buddhism’s Developments in India and Abroad
 Through the Ages; Map of the World’s Buddhist Centres.
3. Mahayana and Hinayana
Ambedkarism in the World; Buddhism and Hinduism.
4. Buddhist Traditions
(a) Buddhist Symbols, (b) Postures of Buddha Image, (c) Research Material on Southern Buddhism; Recent Studies on Southern Buddhism; Activities of Lay Buddhists.
5. Rejoicing and Reversing the Wheel of Becoming
Festivals; Dhamma Cakka Pavattana.
6. Buddhist Revival in East and West International Buddhism
7. international buddhism
Afghanistan; Bangladesh; Bhutan; Burma; Cambodia; China; Hongkong: India; Indonesia : (a) Bali, (b) Borneo, (c) Java, (d) Sumatra; Japan; Korea; Laos; Malaysia; Mongolia; Nepal; Pakistan; Siberia; (U.S.S.R.); Singapore; Sri Lanka; Taiwan; Thailand; Tibet; Union of Soviet Socialist Republic; Viet-Nam (N. & S.).; Argentina; Australia; Austria; Belgium; Brazil; Canada; Czechoslovakia; Denmark; Finland; France; Germany (E & W); Ghana; Greece; Hungary, Ireland; Italy; Luxembourg; Mexico; Netherlands; New Zealand; Norway; Phillipines; Poland; South Africa; Spain; Sweden; Switzerland; Tanzania; United Kingdom; United States of America; Zambia.
8. Concept of Inequality of Religions and Definitions of Religions
Social Inequality; Ill-Treatment and Opposition; Phule; Dr. Ambedkar; Graded Inequality; A Philosophy of a Religion; The Scheme of Manu; Brahmanism, Buddhism, Christian and Islam Religions; Man as Child of God; God, Man, Woman-according to Manu and Nietzsche:
Morality, Religious Consecration of Inequality; What is Common to Religions: Oppositions among Religions; Are Atheist Systems Religions?; Inequal Developments of Religions; Various Concepts of Soul, Vedic, Avestic, Greek, Christian, Vaishnav and Sikh Concepts, Christ and Church; Inequality or A Common Factor of a Religious Experiences; Faith and Liberty; Conversion by Religious Means: Disagreement on Contents of Religion, Cicero, Fowler and Webb, What is Religion?: Lubbock and Flint; Marx; Dr. Kausalyayan; M.R. Sankrityayan.
9. Religion and Other Departments of Knowledge
A Blind Man Looking; Scope of Religion, Religion in Medical; Religion and Theology; Centre of Religion and Theology: Religion and Philosophy; Religion and Language; Cognitive Religious Sentence: Religion and God: St. Anselm; Russell; Religion and Mysticism Religion and Worship; Religion and Immortality (Soul); Religion and Knowledge; Religion and Education; Religion and Science; Religion and Morality: Religion and Conversion; Philosophy of Religion: Religion and the Humanities; Religious Studies as a whole; Religion and Dhamma; Religion and Anthropology: Religion and Sociology; Religion and History; Religion and Psychology: Phenomenology and Religion; Religion and Law; Religion and Ethics; Religion and Humanity. Comparative Religion; Religion and Symbols; Religion and its Measurement.
10. The Religion of Zarathustra and the Religion of Buddha
Avesta: Tripitaka; Common Religion; The Life of Zoroaster; The Life of Buddha; Teachings of Zoroaster; Ahura; Mazda; Mazdaism; Trinity; Monotheism; Dualism; Reason and Morality: Good; Man; Symbol; Eschatology; Spread of Zoroastrianism; Modifications; Haoma (Soma); Fravashis; Yazatas; Later Avesta; The Doctrine of Evil; Journey of Soul; Impact of Zoroastrianism; Effect of the Muslim Conquest; The Old Rites; The Parsees; Teachings of Buddha; The Brahma Jala or 186 dialogues; Arhata; Ten Fetters; Conversion; Trinity in other religions; Monad; Dualism; Reason and Morality; Good Man; Symbol; Rebirth; Spread of Buddhism; Modification; Intoxicant; Spirits; The Angels; The Doctrine of Evil; Transmigration.
11. Buddhism and Greek Religion
Greece and India; Ethics; The Vedic and Greek Speculation; Vedic, Greek and Buddhist Ethics; Deva; Sub-humans; Jhana-consciousness and Moral consciousness; Ethic and Karma; Breaking round of Rebirth according to Buddhism; Greek Philosophy and Buddhist Philosophy; Alexander (c.336-323 B.C.); Polybius (c. 204-c. 122 B.C.); Rationality and Superstition; Pythagoras (c.570-500 B.C.); Number and Letter, Mystic idealism (Vinnanavada); Non-Dualism, Anicca (Impermonence), Sacca (Truth): Dukkha (Dissatisfaction); Sufis, Atomism, Composite Bodies, Realism; Gymno-sophism; Neo-Platonism.
12. Hinduism and Buddhism
Hinduism and Buddhism; India was a Buddhist country, Decline of Buddhism in India: We are Sindhus, not Hindus; The Teachings of Hinduism.
13. Judaism and Buddhism
Differences; Old Testament; Persecution; Holy Land and Rabbi, Abraham; God and History: Moses; Ten Commandments; Ezra: Covenant under Ezra; Jews and their Survival; Moses ben Maimon; Thirteen Fundamentals; Summary of Judaism.
14. Buddhism and Jainism
Ethics; Jainism; Asceticism; Parshva; The Chaturyama; Mahavira; His Life and Mission; Mortification; Conversion; Philosophy and Ethics; Ahimsa; Non-violence; God but not ‘a Creator’; Philosophy, Soul but ‘an Impermanent Soul’; The World; Karmas; The View of Relations; Caste; Brahminism and Jainism; The World View; Two Categories; Five Groups; Mokshas; Five Vows; Women and Sex; Rules for the Laity: Schism; School of Logic; Population; Mahavira’s Dictum; Architecture; The Ford-finders.
15. Buddhism and Confucianism
Confucianism; Teaching: Universality of Shu; Hard to Live upto; Jen; Syncretism; Socretes of Asia.
16. Buddhism and Taoism
Lao-tze; Earth; Sky; Spirits; Ancestor; Burials; Shrines; Social grades; Tao as one; Ethics; Good; Tao as doing nothing: Tao and Arms; Tao as humility; Tao as the Law of reverse evolution; Tao as infinite; Tao’s call is ‘back to the Nature’; Religion and Magic of Tao.
17. Buddhism and Shintoism
Shinto; Izanagi and Izanami; Interpretation of Myth; Old Shinto; Ryobu Shinto or ‘Mixed Shinto; New Shinto; Restoration; Ceremony; The Shrine at Ise; Patriotism.
18. Buddhism and Christianity
Points of Contrast; Fate; Jesus; The Births; The Parents; The Jews; The Gentiles; The Name; The Silent Years; Jerusalem; The Jordan; Revelation; Temptation; His Ministry; Disciples; Beginning of the Galilean Ministry; His Healing Power and Fame; The Growth of Opposition; Preparation for Crucifixion; The Last Journey; The Last Laos, India; The West; North America, Canada, Central America Europe; Hungary, Germany, Bavaria, Berlin; Budapest: Sweden, Hamburg: Brussels, Italy, E. Germany, Hague, Czechoslovakia, France and Switzerland, England, France; Russia, Africa, Australia, Pals, the Language Unique; Buddhism, the Religion Unique. The Buddha the Teacher Unique.
Impact of Religion on Man and Society: Conversion in the Past Conversion Due to Expulsion: Conversion Due to Persecutions; Conversion by Force; Conversion by Temptations: Conversion Due to Atrocities; Beginning of True Conversion by Hearts; Conversion Due to Inequality of Man: Choice of Conversion; Buddha’s Method of Conversion; Conversion after Careful Consideration, Conversions by Dr. Ambedkar, Dr. Ambedkar’s Method of Conversion: Norm of a True Buddhists: What is Not Religion and What is True Religion; Hinduism; Jainism; Sikkhism; Islam; Christianity; Marxism, Buddhism, Vow to Embrace Buddhism; The Vows; Rational Conviction. A Religion; Ambedkar’s Perspective; Relative worth; A Religion of a Philosophy: Greatest Religion has Greatest Philosophy; Ambedar’s Rule of Trinity.
19. Evaluation and Conclusion
Science, Philosophy and Religion; Life and Religion; Nation and Religion; Facts of Life; Inequality; Rivalry; Race-religion; Like-religions; International Religions; Buddha and Nanak; Religion’s World Order, Priests and Beasts; Class and Mass; Conversion and Religion; Man is Supreme.
20. Chronology: Dr. Ambedkar (Before and After)
Bibliography
Index

Preface

philosophy by the researcher disciplined in the faculty of Pali and Prakrit of Nagpur It is a novel undertaking of research in the discipline of comparative religion and University Also trained in the Thought of Dr. Ambedkar, I was inclined to undertake research in the area of Buddhism and Ambedkarism.
During my eight years residence in England I was astonished to observe the British Test of judging the worth of a candidate for the higher studies. I was then B.A. Fail, I was admitted to the research course of M. Phil in the Lancaster University The only criterian, adopted by the experts was oral interview. Under my research supervisors, Prof. Ninian Smart and Prof. Andrew Rawlinson I had been the student of M.Phil Degree in Lancaster University. My work was hamphered by my departure from England to India to attend to my Teacher, Preceptor and Guardian, Bhadant Dr. Ananda Kausalyayan in his last days, until he passed away on 22nd June 1988. On May 2, 1989 1 had registered for the Degree of Ph.D. in Nagpur University under my Guide, Friend and Philosopher, and Head of the Post Graduate Department of Pali and Pakrit, Dr. Bhau Saheb Lokhande. My heartiest thanks are due to him for giving me the utmost liberty to evolve the method of research of my own.
About four and half years elapsed since my research title ‘Inequality of Religions and Need of Conversion with special Reference to Buddhism and Dr. Ambedkar’ was accepted for the study.
During this period I have been engaged in collecting notes and organising them in the form of a research volume. Piles of notes grew rather alarmingly Dr. M. Shamkumar, Dr. S. K. Thorat and Dr. Yashawant Manohar, the respective Heads of P. G. Departments of Dr. Ambedkar Thought, Philosophy and Marathi advised me to curtail them to the manageable size. Their advice has been very useful. Even then the reduced volume of my thesis became bigger than desired. It could have been fasioned to right proportion and less number of repetetions, which were inevitable keeping in view the vastness and nature of such thesis.
In the course of my studies I have been helped in several ways by my well-wishers Shri Shivalingaih and Shri K.R. Moon.
In need of economic help no timely aid came. I ran a debt of a large amount of loan. While I am stil! desperately worried to relieve my debt a U.G.C. grant for the year 1991-1992 arrived. It was better late than never. Delay was due for further instalment also. But thank Lord the tragedy ended in comedy.
philosophy by the researcher disciplined in the faculty of Pali and Prakrit of Nagpur It is a novel undertaking of research in the discipline of comparative religion and University Also trained in the Thought of Dr. Ambedkar, I was inclined to undertake research in the area of Buddhism and Ambedkarism.
During my eight years residence in England I was astonished to observe the British Test of judging the worth of a candidate for the higher studies. I was then B.A. Fail, I was admitted to the research course of M. Phil in the Lancaster University The only criterian, adopted by the experts was oral interview. Under my research supervisors, Prof. Ninian Smart and Prof. Andrew Rawlinson I had been the student of M.Phil Degree in Lancaster University. My work was hamphered by my departure from England to India to attend to my Teacher, Preceptor and Guardian, Bhadant Dr. Ananda Kausalyayan in his last days, until he passed away on 22nd June 1988. On May 2, 1989 1 had registered for the Degree of Ph.D. in Nagpur University under my Guide, Friend and Philosopher, and Head of the Post Graduate Department of Pali and Pakrit, Dr. Bhau Saheb Lokhande. My heartiest thanks are due to him for giving me the utmost liberty to evolve the method of research of my own.
About four and half years elapsed since my research title ‘Inequality of Religions and Need of Conversion with special Reference to Buddhism and Dr. Ambedkar’ was accepted for the study.
During this period I have been engaged in collecting notes and organising them in the form of a research volume. Piles of notes grew rather alarmingly Dr. M. Shamkumar, Dr. S. K. Thorat and Dr. Yashawant Manohar, the respective Heads of P. G. Departments of Dr. Ambedkar Thought, Philosophy and Marathi advised me to curtail them to the manageable size. Their advice has been very useful. Even then the reduced volume of my thesis became bigger than desired. It could have been fasioned to right proportion and less number of repetetions, which were inevitable keeping in view the vastness and nature of such thesis.
In the course of my studies I have been helped in several ways by my well-wishers Shri Shivalingaih and Shri K.R. Moon.
In need of economic help no timely aid came. I ran a debt of a large amount of loan. While I am stil! desperately worried to relieve my debt a U.G.C. grant for the year 1991-1992 arrived. It was better late than never. Delay was due for further instalment also. But thank Lord the tragedy ended in comedy.
Ambedkar Perspective on Buddhism and other Religion Upasika Vatsalabai Gajbhiye looked after my needs of clothings, shelter and food at Bodhi residence of Indira Nagar, Tekdi Wadi on Khadgao Road near Am Mumbai Highway Shri Laxman Rao Rangari and Srimati Satyabhamabai have been my guardian to support requisites during my stay with them since the end of my term of residence at Gokulpeth Buddha Vihara.
While I had been staying in Telankhedi a continuous supply of food stuffs and goods had been at my disposal ever since.
Miss Nirmala, Miss Geeta and Miss Shyama wished me all good success in all my undertakings. Harshavardhan carried tiffin for me daily. Shishupal and Vinod attended me from time to time.
All Good Upasikas, namely Bhitremai, Shakun, Ramteke, Gedam, Gajbhiye Kumbhare, Nagadeve, Naik, Meshram, Wankhede, Gondane, Lonarkar, Mankar many others, whose names would not be forgotten even without mention, could not be left out of the list of vote of thanks.
And Specially Mahendra Bawane who typed as many as fourteen chapters of my thesis, and Miss Nilima Deshpande, who typed and read proof of this work deserved my special thanks.
Shri Mhaske and Shri Sharma also did work for me. I owe them my vote of thanks.
Mahima printing press has done cover composing, chapter printing and binding work for the thesis. My thanks are due to them all too.
I am also thankful to Sanjay, Sonu Chanda and Guddu of True copy centre for doing a xerox work for my thesis.
More care had been taken to organise and edit my material of research work and complete it within the required time. Despite all this, slight errors might be left and detected after closest scrutiny. I accept all the responsibility for any error in the work.
Rather a daring conclusion is drawn after the study of comparative religion in this thesis. It concludes that Buddhism is the best of all other religions. This is the dispassionate and objective deduction. Side by side Atheism, Marxism and Ambedkarism are included as ideologies treated as religions in the thesis. This was inevitable because Buddhism required approach from both sides, namely secular and spiritual.
I have read number of books on religions. They either missed Buddhism or mixed it with other religious views. Dr. Ambedkar represented Buddhism in right and true spirit. This work is a small step in that direction.
I am now more than pleased for being able to complete this work and submit it to Nagpur University at last. Whatever new and original contribution is visible in it. all that was possible due to inspiration of Lord Buddha and Bodhisattva Ambedkar. I pay my homage to them and remember my departed parents in them in the end. May all beings be well and happy.
Date : 05.01.04
Place: Dr. Ambedkar Nagar, MHOW
Professor C.D. NAIK

Introduction

Methodology

In the beginning of the dissertation the topic has been specified and its limit has been set out.
To introduce these works of research the researcher had adopted scientific method of noting, reporting, observing facts and events, analyzing and exploring them and being objective as much as humanly possible during stating the facts and formulating the hypothesis. Thus the methods of investigation and evaluation is objective. However there have been certain constraints of avoiding detailed examination of the subject matter and suppressing much of the data to illustrate certain point of argument or the essence of circumstances on the part of the researcher.
While research in social sciences in general and comparative religion in particular is extremely sensitive and scientific objectivity in its methodology is hardest thing to get the task is not quite next to impossible given firmness and sharpness of mind and use of hermeneutic techniques.
Before undertaking this research project the researcher had undergone the training of objective looking through the courses of Vipassana techniques under various international Vipassana Academy, Igatpuri; Late Dr. Bhadant Anand Kausalyayan, Nagpur: Achan Thong, Thailand; Bhikku Buddhadasa, Chayya, Thailand and others. After mastering this technique the researcher has managed to practice it during his career’s activities as teacher, learner, speaker and writer. So this much can be verified that objectivity part of this study has been taken care of. However the author does not claim infallibility to his words and acts and he firmly believes in law of improvement at every point of theory and practice.
Having said this let me now discuss the suggestions given by Prof. D.L. Ramteke, who examined my Ph.D. level research work and had rendezvous with the researcher in the department of Pali and Prakrit at 11/30 a.m. on 14th November 1994 as under.
A discovery of new facts: It was certainly a new thing for any one living in cloistered region to find that a certain way of life, say, Buddhist way is not confined to one particular place but it is seen observed and lived up to by millions of people Ambedkar’s Perspective on Buddhism and other Religions in hundreds of countries in the world, and this certainly enlarges one’s horizon of vision in the subject discussed.
A fresh approach towards the interpretation of facts: In fact each man is a unique person not as outward bodily mass but as mental culture also. Naturally the present writer’s perspective was an accumulated vision of his own efforts, his environment, his company, his background, his life and experiences, which are bound to be not very identical with nor very different from any other person but it may be just as fresh as the current study is a fresh approach towards the topic handled.
Although the above work embodies the result of researcher’s own observations it is open for verification for anyone and everyone either to ascertain the facts or disapprove of them and correct the investigator of this project.
The investigation made in the subject is objectively undertaken and its result is recorded as findings of the subject. That may add to the existing status of knowledge as a new perspective, new interpretation, new discovery, analogy and methodology or it may not add anything new to existing knowledge but still it is useful to confirm the status quo as no change. However the later aspect cannot be held in the light of universally recognized law of improvement at each and every point of thinking, saying and acting in life.
In brief the above book containing this research is thus rightly captioned as “Ambedkar’s Perspective on Buddhism and Other Religions” at the time of its publication ten years after the award of the Ph. D. Degree was conferred on researcher by the University. It may serve as guide to comparative religion and Ambedkar’s vision in historical and analytical perspective to students, professionals and commoners alike. It discovers such facts as are and have been unknown to the investigator and many like him and thus it is a discovery of new facts also as long as those facts are corresponding to actual instances of life.
Some people may raise the query as to the lengthy body, ambiguity, drawback say as demerits of the book and in response to their such query it is suffice to an ideal of perfection is yet to be achieved and it is just lifting of the leg to take first step towards it and keep on improving as and when necessary.
I hope the above explanation will recall to my mind Dr. D.L. Ramteke at whose behest I have incorporated it in this prologue and his memory to which I pay my humble gratitude.
Having said this, the judgement on the success of dissertation is left into the hands of the readers and the writer accepts all such errors or omissions as might have remained in the work due to an oversight. I express my thanks to all who helped me during my work of dissertation and M. Phil examination.

Beginning of Religion

The Buddha was the greatest proponent of man and humanism in the sixth century before Christ. His gospel was revived in India again by the Bodhisattva Dr. Ambedka in the twentieth century or in the 2500 years of the Buddha Era.
Man lived under savagery in Africa and in Palestine from 1,750,000 years to 3000 years.
The oldest village that was found in Iran dated back to 6800 B.C
Men of Livestock travelled along the Mediterranean Coastline and migrated into Europe first and then into Russia during the period between 4500 BC. and 2500 BC
Farming began under the woman for the first time before the Male began to dominate society and religion.
Copper civilization was known in North America and Turkey before the civilizations of Mesopotamia between the Euphrates and the Tigris, of Summer on the Nile, of Mohenjo-Daro and the Harappa over the Sind and Punjab Indus Valley, and of China and Greece.
The development of articulate speech was the first thing which divided man from the brute.’ The discovery of the Bow and Arrow was the greatest achievement of primitive man. The transition from savagery to barbarism was marked by the discovery of pottery. To domesticate wild animals and the art of smelting iron were advanced by barbaric man. The art of making ideas tangible by means of graphic signs marked off barbaric people from civilized people. This is how civilization began.

Religious consciousness was born with the emergence of man.’ Primal Religions

Primal Religions are prior to the ‘Universal religions’. There are about 200-300 million tribal peoples of the Americas, Africa, Asia and Oceania, whose religions are termed as ‘Heathen ‘Savage’, ‘Primitive’, ‘Superstitious’, ‘Animistic’, ‘pre-literate’, Traditional’, ‘Ethnic’, ‘Magic’, and ‘Tribalism’.’
The savage knows nothing about the laws of nature, for whom death is killing of an angry god. When told that his gods do not exist the savage merely laughs in wild wonder at such an extraordinary observation being made.*
Takahito Mikasa said “Early men were actors rather than thinkers”.
Primal religion is spiritualism or a belief in ‘bodiless spirits’. This belief has given rise to much speculation and superstition despite the fact that ‘our body is material but we are not matter’.”
Primal religions are generally dealt with as theist religions by most writers. But was the early man theist and was his religion simply a surrender to god, to soul, or to any other thing? Was theist belief compatible with the primitive world of hunting and farming?
Professor Gora said “Real living requires man’s active mastery over his world of hunting or farming. Mastery is anti-theistic.”
Professor Ajnat states “Atheism is as ancient as theism”.
Tribal religion has no written language and no literature, no history, no conscious progress. No change unless the existing social order has been changed into something higher.
What is the most essential aspect of primal religions? According to Freud the most essential to Primal religions is its ‘totemic origin”. To Darwin it is evaluation to monotheism. Taylor underlines animism. To Spencer it is ancestor worship’. And
Frazer stressed “magic in primal religions.”
Dr. Ambedkar observes in the religion of the savage two things. First, the performance of rites and ceremonies, the practice of magic or taboo and the worship of fetish or totem. The second, connection of the above with certain occasions of death and war worked out for the performance of rites and ceremonies, the use of human life such as birth, attaining manhood, reaching puberty, marriage, sickness, magic and the worship of the totem.
Dr. Ambedkar criticized the students of the origin and history of religion by saying that ‘they sought to explain the origin and substance of religion by reference to either magic, taboo and totem and the rites and ceremonies and deemed the occasions with which they are connected as of no account. Consequently we have theories explaining religion as having arisen in magic or as having arisen in fetishism, Nothing can be greater error than this.
The principle things in the religion of the savage are the “elemental facts of human existence such as life, death, birth, marriage, etc. Magic, taboo, totem, fetish etc., are not the ends. They are only the means. The end is life and the preservation of life” o 10/
This is what Max Muller (b. 1823) said about the basis of divine religion. He wrote: ‘The supernatural or divine religion is one which has been produced on natural basis itself”. “
This is suffice to understand the two roots of theism and atheism in primal religions.
Let us now turn to the recorded history of the New World which started from the birth of the Buddha but is calculated since the Christ’s birth.

Evolution of Religions

Long long time ago man was just one of the physical entities in the nature. Since he developed his consciousness and speech, and art of writing, he began to conquer the nature and time. He saw within and without. He found moral law working in and natural law working out. The outer was his God. The inner was his Soul. Recognition of this fact was religion.
Later generations of men discussed how the religion came into being and still later as to why there are so many religions in the world. Is the God one and the Soul other or are they both the same? How did the matter evolve or who created it? How did the mind come into being or what is its nature? Is man subordinate to religion or is he the maker of all?
Questions like these were discussed by the religions of the world. There are as many religions as there are answers to them. PRIMAL religions see nature in its variety and they developed a variety of beliefs about the life as a whole. Atheism claims its anciency as much back as the stage of human struggle for existence.
VEDISM was the way of living with the stark nature. BRAHMANISM was the priest-made religion of mantra’ elevated to the godly status of Brahma with acts of bloodshed of sacrifices for flesh-eating and soma-drinking in communion with God by his worshippers that surpassed the Vedic simplicity. Brahmanism was just another name of supremacy of priest-class in India. JAINISM initiated revolt against and rejection of sacrificial slaughter of living beings and things so that it practically recognised the nature as the animated existence. BUDDHISM not only denounced the Brahmanism for degrading man to the worst condition but also did elevate him to the position of a maker of all good in his nature morality, rationality, liberty, fraternity and equality for all, especially the fallen men and women.
The Aryan tribe of Iran and the Indo-Aryans were living together and they spoke the same language, and practised the same religion as the contents of the Vedas and that of the Avesta evidently show. Later they separated from each other and migrated thence into the north-west India one after another. There they came into contact with the Naga tribes of the Shramana or Recluse culture of Mohenjo-Daro and Harappa, the superior culture in respect of mental and moral development compared to other parallel cultures of ancient world. ZOROASTRIANISM developed its doctrine of Dualism of moral and immoral forces manifest in man and nature from its contact with the superior Shramana culture. At the same time it gave impetus to the moral consciousness of JUDAISM. But it retained certain elements of Brahmanism such as caste divisions and names of the gods due to its prior association with the Indo-Aryans.
Morality was spread in the world first by the wanderings of the Naga tribes belonging to Avedic Shraman Culture, then by the missionary Buddhist Sangha members sent into the Western, Southern, Eastern and South-eastern quarters of the world by the world’s greatest democratic monarch emperor Ashoka of India 219 years after the demise of the Buddha (483 B.C.) and more than 228 years before the birth of the Christ.12
In the regions surrounding the river Jordan was inhabited the semitic race descending from Abraham of Ur. Their tribal God was known as Jehovah. The Hebrews were His chosen race. He first appeared and declared his name to Moses, who then rescued his lot from the Egyptian bondage to the place called mount of Sinai. There they broke the holy covenant and as a result they had to keep on wandering for forty years until they reached the promised land of Canaan, where their ancestor Abraham also went earlier. The Hebrews, after their exodus from Babylonian captivity and the second destruction of their temple at Jerusalem, came to be known as the Jews. Since the advent of Christ the Jews began to be called the Christians. Christianity dissociated itself from the Old Testament and rested itself on the New Testament. It recognised the Christ as the only Son of God vested with the divine authority. ISLAM recognised that God is one and he is Allah. It believed that the last prophet was Mohammed and that the God’s perfect revelation is contained in the Quran. The Kaaba at Mecca in Arabia is its holiest centre. There Ambedkar’s Perspecti were many crusades waged amongst the Jews, the Christians, and the Muslims similar to Mahabharata war and French and Russian Revolutions.
In the medieval period during the Moghul rule India was immersed into the Bhakti Cult and Islam was busy with annihilating the Buts (idolatry). This Sant tradition saw the rise of lower caste saints wandering across the country to preach that the abode of God is in the inside of man and formalism of religion was futile. In the 1600 A.D. Guru Nanak came and founded Sikkhism based on the teachings of
these saints leading to devotionalism and Islamic monotheism.
In Greece religion began to be discussed philosophically since the days of the Buddha. It influenced the theological and philosophical thinking of the West. In the wake of new enlightenment of scientific discoveries and social revolutions in Europe, religion was found to have crossed its nationality and come across all nations of the world.
The three were recognised as the World religions: Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam. Buddhism went West while retaining its hold in the East, the Southwest Asia. and reviving itself in India in number of population and in the form of Indian Constitution fathered by Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar. While it being so, Christianity came to India, first to trade and then to rule under the Britishers. Parsees fled from Iran under Islamic persecution and took shelter in Bombay and Gujarat. Islam went East.
Conversion from one world religion to another began. Rational criticism was applied to religions. Merits were explored in their scriptures and their worths were valued by the scientists of religions. The Discipline of Comparative religion held all religions as equal in worth. But the philosophy of religion does not. It was the problem to explore which religion best answers the problems of the present conditions and which religion stands the test of reason and humanism. Karl Marx rejected all religions and established his ideology of economic world order. Krantiveer Jyotirao Phule followed the tradition of Buddha and Kabir and brought about social change in the life of the Shudras and women. In the same tradition. Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar looked at religion from the angle of the masses, critically valued the Indian religions and came to the conclusion that judged on the criterion of reason ‘Buddhism alone is the religion of universal love and humanism.’ He embraced Buddhism and recommended it for others also. Thus he established the Human World Order.
You May Also Like

Freud Manovishleshan

अनुवादक की ओर से आज किसी शिक्षित व्यक्ति को सिगमण्ड फ्रायड का परिचय देने की आवश्यकता नहीं। उन्नीसवीं-बीसवीं…
Read More